Topic: gender, sex and health essay

Gender, Sex and Health

Learning Outcome 1 To demonstrate a critical understanding of Gender in the arena of health
Learning Outcome 2 To critically analyse two different health topics harnessing a suitable Gender or Sex Role theory
Learning Outcome 3 Author a personal reflective account on a learning experience
Number of Words of Assessment 3000 / 100% weighting
Week Assessment due

COURSEWORK: 2500 words:
Critically analyse two different health topics through applying a theoretical perspective.
The chosen theoretical perspective for each health topic must be explained. If appropriate, you can apply the same theory to the two different health topics.
COURSEWORK: 500 words:
Produce a reflective account related to 6HL001 material applying a suitable reflective model.

Marking Criteria
Suitable gender or sex role theory identified, explained and critically analyses one health topic
1250 words. 40%
Suitable gender or sex role theory identified, explained and critically analyses one health topic
1250 words. 40%
Produce a reflective account related to 6HL001content utilising a reflective model. This work will lean on personal accounts made throughout the semester
500 words. 10%
The essay is consistently and thoroughly referenced using the Harvard System
The essay uses appropriate academic language, is coherently organised and contains few spelling and grammatical errors. 10%

The first section of the essay will outline a health issue linked with gender. It will then outline & critically discuss one theory and show how this can enhance our understanding of the chosen health topic. The second section of the essay will outline a different health issue linked with gender and outline & critically discuss one theory again showing how this can enhance our understanding of the chosen health topic.

To address learning outcome three and the reflective journal element of the marking criteria you will write a reflective summary (500 words) reviewing the thoughts, opinions and feelings experienced throughout the module. An academic model of reflection (Kolb or Gibbs) must be incorporated within this 500 word summary. The 500 word reflection will be incorporated in to one word document following the 2500 word coursework above. In order to complete this section you will need to record your views weekly after each lecture. It is hoped your initial views will develop over the course of the module.

Level 6 Grade Descriptors will be used to calculate your mark

Percentage Descriptor
90-100%
Outstanding Exceptional level of analysis, showing deep critical engagement with a comprehensive range of contextual material. Demonstration of independent thought resulting in highly original or creative responses to the assignment. Provision of clear evidence of understanding of current scholarship and research based on an extensive range of relevant sources. Extreme clarity of structure demonstrating complete focus of argument.
No obvious errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate.
80-89%
Excellent Excellent links between relevant ideas, theories and practice. Evidence of clearly independent scholarship and the ability to engage critically and analytically with a wide range of contextually relevant resource material.
Demonstration of original insights, supported by extremely well structured overall argument. Very few errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate.
70-79%
Very good Very good links between a range of different ideas and theories. Places issues in a wider context. Evidence of clear understanding of a range of relevant theories and application of these appropriately. Independent ideas, well argued and supported. Few errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate.
60-69%
Good Clear links between theory and practice. Good coverage of assignment issues. Full understanding of core issues. Evidenced level of understanding of appropriate theory and concepts. Some small repeated errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate
50-59%
Competent Identifies main issues and relevant theory. Coverage of most of assignment issues. Competent application of relevant theory and states obvious links to practice. Some repeated errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate.
40-49%
Pass Makes few links between theory and practice. Answers question in a very basic way. Describes relevant theory accurately, and some relevant ideas offered. Limited coherence of structure.
30-39%
Fail Some learning outcomes and / or assessment criteria not met.
Inadequate content with issues not addressed; insufficient evidence of understanding of relevant theory and concepts and only partial understanding shown. Very limited application of theory. Use of extensive quoted passages is evident. Evidence of sufficient grasp of learning outcomes to suggest that the student will be able to retrieve the module on resubmission.
20-29%
Fail No learning outcomes fully met. No demonstration of adequate knowledge or understanding of key concepts or theories. There is no recognition of the complexity of the subject.
10% – 19%
Fail Little attempt to engage with assignment brief and has not met learning outcomes. Inadequate demonstration of knowledge or understanding of key concepts, theories or practice.
0-9%
Fail No real attempt to address the assignment brief or learning outcomes.

Type of service-Rewriting
Type of assignment-Essay
Subject-Healthcare&Medicine
Pages / words-11 / 3000
Number of sources-21
Academic level-Undergraduate
Paper format-Harvard
Line spacing-Double
Language style-UK English

get essaywriters

Related Post