Topic: Pensions and Healthcare in the Canadian Welfare State

You will write about EITHER one issue area in two countries OR two issues areas in one country, in a

classic compare and contrast format. Are the values, organizational formats/methods (provision,

financing, arranging), and outputs/outcomes the same or different? How and why? Do these issue areas

“work” the way that the classic Esping-Andersen typology would predict? How have things changed over time, if at all?

Each paper should be about 1500-1750 words long.

Papers must contain long term, comparative data . Data free papers will be marked down substantially

in the absence of some reasonable excuse. Thus this resource is essential for your papers: https://data.oecd.org/

It has a simple make your own chart feature.

It’s the easier to use interface for this: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/statistics → scroll down to

databases and then look right to social expenditure and social and welfare databases. Also here:

https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/data/oecd-social-expenditure-statistics_so

cx-data-en . The social expenditure database is about spending (how much; by whom?) social and

welfare database is about outcomes (what happened; for whom?).

Go to http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org and search by topic. Most are titled “XX at a glance, Year” or “XX

Outlook, Year”

Type of service-Academic paper writing
Type of assignment-Research Paper
Subject-Not defined
Pages / words-6 / 1650
Number of sources-8
Academic level-Junior (College 3rd year)
Paper format-MLA
Line spacing-Double
Language style
US English

get essaywriters

Related Post